EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Reapplicant Guide
    • Pitching Entrepreneurship as Your Post-MBA Career
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Harvard 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Stanford 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Wharton 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Columbia 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • Testimonials & Reviews
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts

Practice on this sentence.

August 9, 2022 by EssaySnark Leave a Comment

You’re not the only one who struggles to put together clear sentences.

Case in point, we offer this from an article on how we’re totally doomed plankton in the ocean:
 

header of plankton article

 

From the article:

An Edinburgh-based research team fears plankton, the tiny organisms that sustain life in our seas, has all but been wiped out after spending two years collecting water samples from the Atlantic.

 

You likely can figure it out just fine, but if you’re like EssaySnark, it may have taken a re-read or two.

Before we talk about what’s wrong with this, why not take a minute studying it for yourself, to see if you can spot what’s off here?

(Scroll down when you’re ready….)

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

The issue is that there’s a misplaced clause.

The phrase “after spending two years…” is modifying the subject of the sentence — the Edinburgh research team. But its placement in the sentence makes it seem like the plankton are the one who spent two years collecting samples.

There’s actually another issue with this sentence as well.

The way it’s used here, “plankton” is apparently a plural noun.

The writer defines “plankton” as “tiny organisms”; they use the plural of “organism” to explain what the word “plankton” means.

If therefore “plankton” is one of those words, like “fish” or “deer”, where you use the same word to refer to both the singular and plural, then the sentence does not work with the verb construct of “has been wiped out”.

It should say “have been wiped out” if “plankton” is plural.

This is the type of issue that can arise in two ways:

One is that, as the writer, you know what you’re trying to say. You have the intended meaning in your head as concepts, and your brain then translates those concepts into the language you’re using, by putting it into words on the page as you type.

However, since you have the meaning already established for yourself in your brain, if you’re not being careful in the original process of putting it on the page, then it may not have originally been produced in a form that other humans who are proficient in that language can decipher.

Each one of us has our own decoder rings installed in our heads, where we do this translation of concepts and symbols and thoughts into actual words. We rely on the probably that others who are socialized into our same language and culture will have a good chance of having a similar-enough decoder ring in their own heads, that we can convey meaning in written form in this way. But it’s up to the one producing the written word to confirm that their decoder ring was working well when they produced it in the first place. One of the key elements of us all having semi-similar decoder rings is how we all had to learn the rules of grammar when we were in gradeschool or went through our English learning classes. Grammar is what helps ensure that the decoder rings are calibrated to one another, even though they reside in totally independent and autonomous entities who usually have never interacted in real-time.

This issue also happens when things are rushed and the proofreading process is curtailed or skipped entirely. The process of writing isn’t just that first step of producing the words. It also requires at least one subsequent step of reviewing the words to be sure they make sense. If the writer didn’t double-check the words by re-reading them — and especially, by double-checking the clauses are created correctly — then there’s no assurance that things will be making sense.

When you are writing complex sentences with multiple clauses like this one, you need to break it apart and test that the core sentence, of the structure subject-> verb -> object, is intact and following the rules that your fifth grade English teacher imparted.

In this sentence, that core is:

An Edinburgh-based research team fears plankton has all but been wiped out.

Oh and hey: Can we please change it to:

… has been all but wiped out

?

As you read everyday news articles and consume whatever forms of the written word that you do, pay attention to the writing. What do you see that works well? Where are the sentences a bit wonky? How would you change them to make them more clear?

Practicing as you go about your everyday routine of written-word consumption can make you a stronger writer, which is at least half of what it takes to put together good essays for this endeavor you are trying for.

And… Pro Tip, if a “news article” that you find on the internet has such poor editing, then there’s a good chance it’s fake news! That article does not stand up to scrutiny. It does not have clearly cited scientific resources and it’s riddled with writing errors. The website looks legit but it seems to be some type of agenda-based propaganda shop.

Not that the planet isn’t in trouble. But we’re not finding any other reputable sources backing this one up.

Be discerning with where you place your attention!

It is because of these reasons that we have not linked to the actual source. We’re not interested in boosting the profile of a shady organization.

Filed Under: writing tips

« Previous: ($) Optional essay for low GPA: “I have proven myself since then by excelling at my job.”
Next: ($) Another warning about tone. »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '24 intake Rd 1
    in 1 month, 1 week, 0 days
  • INSEAD Round 4
    in 1 month, 1 week, 0 days
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 2
    in 2 months, 2 weeks, 4 days
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 3
    in 4 months, 3 weeks, 6 days
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 4
    in 6 months, 1 week, 1 day
   
   

CLASS OF 2025 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

From a former BSer:
"love the guide books!"




    The 2022 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2025
   
    The 2022 Harvard MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
  The 2022 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with clear guidance for the 2022 essays!
   
  The 2022-2023 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2022-2023 applications
   
    The 2022 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video, plus the new optional short-answer question on "the world you come from" -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2025!
   
    The 2022 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values'
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - revised for 2022!
   
    The 2022 UVA Darden MBA Application Guide gives insights on the essays, Early Action, the possibility of a test waiver, and everything else going on here!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Darden MBA - updated for the Class of 2025 requirements!
   
   
The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2025 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2022
   
    The 2022 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2022-2023 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the essays, the EQ Endorsement and test strategies!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2025 essays!
       
   
   
Get started now - without doing any work! The Comprehensive Profile Review will help you start your strategy for your MBA applications.


EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2023 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy