EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Reapplicant Guide
    • Pitching Entrepreneurship as Your Post-MBA Career
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Harvard 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Stanford 2021 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Wharton 2021 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2021 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2021 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Columbia 2021 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • BIPOC Program
    • Testimonials & Reviews
    • Guest Posts
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts
    • Discounts & Offers

It’s not ethical for you to have an admissions consultant review your recommendation letters

August 9, 2021 by EssaySnark Leave a Comment

Basically, the title of the post says it all.

However, for a little review:

1. You cannot write your own recommendations.

(But you can help your recommenders come up with ideas for what they will write about.)

2. You also cannot have an admissions consultant help write or edit your recommendations. You cannot ferry drafts of letters between you and your admissions consultant, or invite your recommender to send drafts to the consultant.

Stanford states this quite clearly on their admissions website — which they shouldn’t have to do, because any competent professional admissions consultant would know it’s unethical to do this.

Because Stanford is posting that, though, then that tells us people are doing this (and that Stanford found out about it!!) and so we’ll help spread the word today that that would be unethical.

Which makes sense, right?

After all, say your recommender writes “John is a very good analyst.”

And then John’s admissions consultant gets ahold of that, and makes a suggestion that the recommender say “John is the best analyst.”

The recommender probably wants to help John get in, and now the admissions consultant has essentially given the recommender permission to exaggerate, bolster the truth, or outright lie in what they are saying.

(EssaySnark stands by the ethics of providing hands-off guidance to recommenders, through our Recommender’s Instructions Sets product, which walks through the questions that your specific school is asking and gives dos and don’ts to your recommender on how to handle them. Which is not at all the same as reviewing an already-written draft and suggesting changes to it.)

You may be sitting here thinking, “Darn it, my recommender isn’t a good writer, so screw this advice, I’m going to get my admissions consultant to help him anyway. Because who is going to ever find out?”

And maybe you’re right. Maybe no one will ever find out.

But clearly, Stanford found out that someone is doing this! That’s how the language on their website showed up. It wasn’t there in past seasons. Now it is. (Kinda like this with Columbia.)

There are going to be a near-infinite number of decisions that you are making on your MBA applications. However, none of them need to be done in a way that’s unethical. It’s totally possible for you to get in — yes, using coaching or a consultant, assuming it’s one who abides by professional standards and supports you by offering the appropriate amount of input, who empowers you with knowledge and techniques for how to present yourself, and critiques your work to help you see how you’re being effective and the ways that you’re not, to help you conquer the learning curve that is the process of developing good essays. But who doesn’t tell you what to write (and most certainly doesn’t write any essays or resume for you!!!!!) and who stays at arm’s length from your work product, so that you can feel confident that what you’re presenting is truly your own.

 
 
 
 

Note: There are no ethical problems with having an admissions consultant review letters of recommendation after they have been submitted and the decision rendered on the app, such as what we invite with the MBA Application Post-Mortem. Many applicants do get copies of their recommendation letters from recommenders. The cautions in this post are focusing on the issue of having an admissions consultant give their own input to the writing of the recommendation before it’s submitted. It’s fair game to have a consultant review the recommendation after the admissions team has rendered their decision. That can be useful, in helping you understand why your app was rejected or waitlisted instead of being outright accepted.

 
 

Filed Under: recommendations, the admissions consulting industry Tagged With: ethics

« Previous: ($) Should you do a “safety” school in Round 1?
Next: ($) What are “extracurriculars”? »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • (expected) Columbia J-Term/ED app to open
    in 0 weeks
  • INSEAD Jan '23 Intake Rd 3
    in 2 weeks
  • INSEAD Jan '23 Intake Rd 4
    in 1 month, 4 weeks
  • Harvard Round 1: Sept. 7
    in 3 months, 1 week
   
Get The MBA Countdown and get week by week guidance to plan your summer and get your apps done!
 
   

CLASS OF 2025 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

From a BSer:
"love the guide books!"




    The 2022 Harvard MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
   

Brave Supplicants' latest reviews on The 'Snark


2020-21 r1 candidate
Apr 19, 2021
 by 2020-21 r1 candidate on Waitlist Assist
Please get this if you have the resources!

I would recommend EssaySnark to every waitlisted candidate! I was waitlisted by one of HSW in R1 this... Read more

hopeful
Feb 11, 2021
 by hopeful on MBA Interview Prep: Custom Practice Questions
Helpful

Just wanted to say thank you for these questions! A lot of them were really tailored to my profile, ... Read more

George
Apr 10, 2020
 by George on EssaySnark
Great Starting Point

I thought getting over the GRE/GMAT hurdle was fairly straightforward--disciplined study then test execution... Read more






Not sure where to begin with EssaySnark?
Our Snark Selector
will tell you!



   
Get started now - without doing any work! The Comprehensive Profile Review will help you start your strategy for your MBA applications.


EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2022 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy

Where should you start with EssaySnark?

Which EssaySnark service is right for you? Answer a few questions to find out!

This field must be set to Everyone - then in the Settings -> HTML -> After Fields screen there's JavaScript to hide it.
Sending