EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Reapplicant Guide
    • Pitching Entrepreneurship as Your Post-MBA Career
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Harvard 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Stanford 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Wharton 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Columbia 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • Testimonials & Reviews
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts

Tracking the system: How are schools changing in terms of diversity and inclusion?

July 12, 2021 by EssaySnark - Discusses Michigan Ross Leave a Comment

Changes are coming slowly.

It’s been over a year since George Floyd was murdered.

All the schools issued statements about Black Lives Mattering at the time. What evidence have we seen that there have actually been changes in how things are run at these places?

Darden continues to be more flexible with testing policies, which is pro-equity. It’s not necessarily enough to truly change how admissions work, but it’s a start.

Columbia is perhaps most notable for including a DEI-focused prompt in its application this year — but this is optional. They are not requiring applicants to write about how they have been impacted by inequality or what they have done to grapple with such issues. Still, it’s a start.

We’ve been clamoring for more transparency for awhile. That apparently is starting to happen.

Harvard was the first school we saw that changed its reporting of the composition of its student body. Last Fall they published their Class of 2022 Profile which included:

HBS class breakdown by race and ethnicity showing  11% Black, 9% Latinx, 53% White

 

You may also have seen the P&Q article on all the new cases that HBS is publishing with Black protagonists.

Focusing on the actual students who are being admitted and how they’re being reflected publicly, a more questionable change in data reporting comes out of Michigan Ross. This is unfortunate:

Michigan Ross MBA Class of 2021 Profile - "minority" at 22%

Michigan Ross MBA Class of 2022 Profile - "students of color" at 36%

At first glance you’re like, “Wow, Ross is really bringing it! Look at that! Increasing enrollment of BIPOC students by that much? Incredible!!”

And then you actually look at the data, and it becomes depressing. (We’re not even going to comment on that sleight-of-hand where they de-emphasized the GMAT score based on the position in the graphic when it went down. Oh wait. Apparently we are going to comment on that.)

First off, when we’re examining the schools’ data on class make-up by student identity, it’s important to recognize how fuzzy the definitions can be. Some schools name “minority” students as any student who is non-white. Only a few schools call out BIPOC numbers explicitly. Then there’s the whole question of what do you use as the denominator. These questions of equality are not U.S.-only, but in light of the newfound awareness following George Floyd’s murder, it’s really an American issue in grappling with its history of slavery. So should the schools be reporting on the percentage of their entire class who are Black/African-American and Latinx? Or only as the percentage of their students who are American citizens?

And the other aspect of inequality in America is unfortunately one that pitches one underrepresented category against another. The current reality is that it’s quite easy for any MBA program to fill its class with Asian-American students. Asian-Americans are absolutely at a disadvantage in our society, and lots of work is needed for equality to include all people. The violence we’ve been witnessing against AAPI (Asian-American Pacific Islanders) is abhorrent, and not nearly enough has been said about this (including here on this site).

However, when the top schools look at their demographics in the applicant pool, there are lots of candidates who identify as AAPI trying for spots. They are not an underrepresented population in this context. If anything, it’s one of the more competitive classifications of candidate.

Therefore, including Asian Americans in the “minority” category is accurate and also misleading. Yet that’s what we get from both sets of numbers from Ross.

That alone isn’t something we can criticize Ross for, since many other top schools do the same. The bigger issue is how they apparently changed their reporting entirely.

In the Class of 2021 data, it seems that they are reporting the percentage of so-called “minority” to be calculated using the total students in the class as the denominator. If our math is accurate, then that means 22% of the 421 students in that year, or 92 students. These 92 students are either U.S. citizens or permanent residents. Non-white students who are internationals are not included, even though they too are “minorities” in America.

How does it break down for the Ross Class of 2022 though?

Well, that’s where they changed things. This apparently is reporting that there were 36% of only the American citizens and permanent residents who identify as non-White, so that means we have 36% of the 82% non-international students of the 358 total in the class. If our math is correct, that gets us to 105 students. That’s actually better than the prior year, as it’s 29% of the total class compared to only 22%. However, it’s misleading because there were only 18% international students to join the Class of 2022. Yes, kudos to Ross for sure for increasing the number of Black and Brown students. That is absolutely worth recognizing. The way they got there seems like it could have been accidental. 🙁 A full-time MBA class with only 18% international students is an anomaly of the pandemic admissions cycle. Ross quite fortuitously launched its Online MBA in 2019, and they were perfectly positioned to support international students there for their 2020 matriculations. They doubled the class size for their Online MBA for the 2020 intake , and the proportion of non-white American students appears to have been cut in half. Taken as a whole, then, it doesn’t appear that Ross substantively changed its acceptance rates for BIPOC students to the full-time MBA cohort especially.

It would be nice if the schools didn’t get cute with the data. Maybe these changes are going to allow for more transparency in the future, but for now, it’s muddying the waters and not allowing a clear picture of just how much progress, if any, has been made in full-time admissions.

Last year when we issued this call to the schools for transparency, we were hoping for a little bit better.

One school that came through: Wharton.

Here’s a chart they’ve published with their Class of 2022 profile :

Breakdown of students in Wharton Class of 2022 by race/ethnicity

Their graphic designer should be fired, because how on earth do you differentiate between those shades of blue??? From an informational design perspective, this sucks. But the data is there. Thank you, Wharton, for the data.

This post isn’t exhaustive; there are other changes happening at other places too. It just seems like very slow going.

Filed Under: school reviews & insights Tagged With: diversity Bschools: Michigan Ross

« Previous: ($) What your HBS essay should not be.
Next: ($) The best way to ask your recommender to write for you »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '24 intake Rd 1
    in 1 month, 1 week, 2 days
  • INSEAD Round 4
    in 1 month, 1 week, 2 days
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 2
    in 2 months, 2 weeks, 6 days
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 3
    in 4 months, 4 weeks, 1 day
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 4
    in 6 months, 1 week, 3 days
   
   

CLASS OF 2025 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

From a former BSer:
"love the guide books!"




    The 2022 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2025
   
    The 2022 Harvard MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
  The 2022 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with clear guidance for the 2022 essays!
   
  The 2022-2023 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2022-2023 applications
   
    The 2022 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video, plus the new optional short-answer question on "the world you come from" -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2025!
   
    The 2022 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values'
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - revised for 2022!
   
    The 2022 UVA Darden MBA Application Guide gives insights on the essays, Early Action, the possibility of a test waiver, and everything else going on here!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Darden MBA - updated for the Class of 2025 requirements!
   
   
The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2025 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2022
   
    The 2022 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2022-2023 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the essays, the EQ Endorsement and test strategies!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2025 essays!
       
   
   
Get started now - without doing any work! The Comprehensive Profile Review will help you start your strategy for your MBA applications.


EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2023 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy