EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Interviewing Guide
    • Getting Off the Waitlist
    • Applying in Round 3 mini-guide
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Columbia 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Harvard 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • MIT Sloan 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • BIPOC Program
    • Testimonials & Reviews
    • Guest Posts
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts
    • Discounts & Offers

A pre-emptive warning post about who will not make it into Harvard this year

July 30, 2020 by EssaySnark - Discusses Harvard 3 Comments

There’s probably three categories of folks who don’t get into Harvard Business school:

1. The qualified but not differentiated

2. The qualified who thought they were differentiated (ouch)

3. And perhaps the most frustrating category: The differentiated who didn’t leverage the app

People in Category 1 will likely land at a good school in the end, but it’s also likely to be a real blow to the self-esteem when they’re cut loose from Harvard in October. These folks usually have been successful compared to their peers in life, such as getting into a good college, following the path laid out for them by going to work at a brand-name firm after school, etc. They are the play-by-the-book types who assume that Harvard will be in range since they landed a 760 GMAT. But for Category 1 folks, no matter how hard they work on the essays for Harvard, they are not likely to be enough to tilt the scales in their favor. We try to gently offer this feedback to them from the Comprehensive Profile Review to the Essay Decimator process, and we also try not to be overly discouraging — because after all, it’s not up to EssaySnark to decide your fate. That’s only for the Harvard Admissions Board to decide. It would suck for an admissions consultant to be so discouraging on your chances that despite your own enthusiasm and motivation, you decide not to apply at all. Because if you really want to try for Harvard, you need to try for Harvard! Regret sucks. It would be awful if you skated straight into schools like MIT and Tuck and Kellogg and didn’t even put your hat into the ring for HBS. You’d have a hard time reconciling that, especially if you only opted out of HBS because some schmuck on the internet told you you’d be wasting your time.

Category 2 is a tough place to be. This is basically the same as the Category 1 folks, except that nobody has offered any input to help manage expectations, and/or the person has a higher opinion of his or herself than reality justifies. This is often the “HBS or Bust!” type who washes out in the end as a bust. The good news is that this person, although often a bit cocky, is still very qualified and very smart, and will inevitably land on their feet and end up in an amazing place in their career later on, building great success for themselves without the MBA. Because the MBA is really not necessary to get where you want to go, if you’re motivated and work hard. Right? Right. And, the other good news is that if this person has humility and self-awareness to know their limitations, and they are able to accept feedback, and do so early enough, and be flexible enough, that they are able to change course with the path that they are pursuing with their Harvard presentation, then it’s very possible that they can turn it around and make the essay do more for them. This often entails throwing away the essay that they thought was close to being “done” and starting over. And, even then, it does not always pan out. But we do often see candidates in Category 2 who actually are differentiated, based on how they change direction and showcase that differentiation much more effectively in the presentation that they deliver in the end. (Shameless Self-Promotion: The Harvard Essay Decimator will let you know if you’re in good shape with what you have, based on a full profile review in conjunction with essay critique, or if you need to go back to the drawing board and try again.)

Category 3 is the land of heartbreak. This is the candidate who really does have some interesting elements to the story, but they didn’t recognize the amount of work that’s needed to get that Harvard essay to say the things that they wanted to say. They are the ones who shy away from introspection, or who become victims of their own procrastination, and often they are those who simply listen to the wrong advisors for help. They put together a passable attempt at an application, but they’ve left all their money on the table and not maximized the opportunity that this Harvard essay truly is.

(As we’ve cautioned before: The essay isn’t as much a determining factor at Harvard, the way it can be at certain other schools. But the essay is a real opportunity and it can take a borderline-consideration candidate way over the edge and down the waterfall to an interview invitation when done well.)

Harvard has been changing its admissions strategy in recent years, so be careful who you are asking for advice on the “how to get in” front. There is no one cookie-cutter answer for Harvard the way there (sort of) is for some other schools. If the admissions consultant you’re using does not have a long track record of success, and a RECENT track record of success, with Harvard Business School, they may not be helping you maximize your own opportunity. Please be careful about who you leverage for advice. We’re not saying that we’re the only one wise enough to give valid input. We are saying that you’re going to have one chance and (for most of you) one chance only. You don’t want this to extend to a multi-year app cycle due to misunderstanding the stakes and underestimating the workeffort.

If we can help, you know how to get us on board!

 
 
 
UPDATE: We continued this discussion on “the Harvard type” here!
 
 
 

Filed Under: school reviews & insights Bschools: Harvard

« Previous: ($) If it’s worth mentioning, it’s worth naming
Next: It’s time »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Here's what others have said about this:

  1. bostonbound says

    July 30, 2020 at 3:02 pm

    Can you guys expand on the meaning of “qualified” and “differentiated” with some examples?

    For instance, 730+ GMAT 3.6 GPA and an MBA story of IB → PE might be “qualified” but not “differentiated”

    What are some other undifferentiated profiles that you feel some applications might mistake as differentiated?

    Reply
    • essaysnark says

      July 30, 2020 at 8:11 pm

      It’s a really great question – and you sort of answered it yourself!

      The “qualified” aspect comes down a lot to the elements you see reported on in a Class Profile — so, just like you referenced, a solid GMAT score, a good GPA, appropriate amount of work experience for the program being targeted.

      That’s why schools like Harvard say that so many of their applicants are qualified — the applicants could all successfully complete the rigorous curriculum from that school and would be ready for the experience of learning the material and using it in future careers.

      The “differentiated” part is truly a qualitative element and takes into account EVERYTHING about that person that’s shared on the app — and we can’t really boil it down to examples, because it’s all completely unique! That’s likely a non-satisfying answer, but it requires seeing at least a resume in order to be able to identify if it’s present in a person’s background. It has to do with the decisions made, opportunities pursued, how the person shows up. Or, it’s about obstacles overcome, demonstration of grit, “soft” qualities like ethics and values and having a backbone, or always doing the right thing no matter what.

      The most common case of “qualified but not differentiated” is possibly slightly less common today, because of the changing international environment and how anti-foreigners the U.S. has appeared to become based on our government’s actions right now: The Indian applicant with the 720 GMAT and a ~7.5 from a middling to decent engineering school. This candidate may or may not understand the level of competition in the American schools (they probably do, because it’s all over the applicant forums now, and it’s been competitive for this pool for so long, that they’d be a little naive to be trying blind for HBS unless there’s something significant to showcase in the background that overcomes these not-stellar stats).

      There are also a lot of military candidates who look the same on paper, who’ve had a harder time converting apps to admits at top schools in recent years.

      Not sure if this helps, but you seem to be understanding it exactly right: The basic sketch of the profile might indicate that someone is totally in line with a school’s class because the averages line up to the class profile. But the individual’s profile isn’t doing enough to give high confidence that they have a shot.

      It’s also not only about core stats: A PE candidate with a 770 or 780 might still not make a dent in the universe. High test scores alone aren’t it. They can help, but it’s about the whole package.

      Did any of this offer an answer to what you are asking? It’s such an important piece to understand — hit us up with more to talk about if you have further questions about it!

      Reply
      • essaysnark says

        July 30, 2020 at 8:20 pm

        Adding to clarify about the example of the Indian candidate:

        The U.S. anti-immigration policies that the current government has enacted have really changed the ecosystem for applications to U.S. schools. There are a lot less international candidates trying now than even a few years ago. That’s what we meant by the reference of the “changing international environment.” The example 720/7.5 profile was SOOOOOOOOO common about five years ago that that person had a really tough time breaking in to ANY top school (not just H/S/W but schools like NYU or Duke). That’s not the situation today. It’s still tough for that candidate, but NOWHERE NEAR as tough as it was in the recent past. It’s a supply-and-demand thing in terms of quantities of similar profiles that the schools are getting.

        Reply

Leave a Reply to essaysnark Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '22 intake Rd 1
    in 0 weeks, 2 days, 17 hours
  • INSEAD Jan '22 Intake Rd 2
    in 1 month, 2 weeks, 6 days, 17 hours
  • (expected) HBS Class of 2024 app requirements released
    in 2 months, 0 weeks, 3 days, 18 hours
  • (expected) Columbia J-Term/ED app to open
    in 3 months, 0 weeks, 1 day, 18 hours
  • INSEAD Jan '22 Intake Rd 3
    in 3 months, 2 weeks, 1 day, 17 hours
   
From a BSer January 2020:
"love the guide books!"


CLASS OF 2023 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

     
    The 2020 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2023 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2020-2021 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the main essay, the EQ Endorsement and Pick Six!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2023 essays!
   
    The 2020-2021 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2020-2021 applications
   
    The 2020 Harvard MBA Application Guide - completely overhauled and updated for the coronavirus era!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
    The 2020-2021 Duke Essay Guide - covers the 25 Random Things essay and all the rest too!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Duke Fuqua - up to date for the current season!
   
    The 2020-2021 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the contacts for two references, and additional tips for the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2023!
   
    The 2020-2021 Tuck Essay Guide has been refreshed with latest insights and advice for your essays about "investing generously" and "why Tuck"!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Dartmouth Tuck MBA - completely overhauled for 2020, to help you demonstrate how you are nice, aware, etc stuff!
   
    The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2023 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2020-2021
   
    The 2020-2021 Chicago Booth MBA Application Guide - ready to go to support your Class of 2023 essay strategy!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Chicago Booth for this year's MBA app!
   
    The 2020 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with new tips for 2020!
   
    The 2020 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values' -- plus tips on 2020 world events and applicability to your essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - updated and revised for the new realities of 2020!    
      The 2020 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2023
   
    The 2020-2021 UCLA Anderson MBA Application Guide - updated for Class of 2023 on "impact"!
SnarkStrategies Guide for 
UCLA
   
   

Brave Supplicants' latest reviews on The 'Snark


Feb 11, 2021
by hopeful on MBA Interview Prep: Custom Practice Questions
Helpful

Just wanted to say thank you for these questions! A lot of them were really tailored to my profile, ... Read more

Apr 10, 2020
by George on EssaySnark
Great Starting Point

I thought getting over the GRE/GMAT hurdle was fairly straightforward--disciplined study then test execution... Read more

Apr 10, 2020
by George on Single Shot Express MBA Essay Review
Worth Every Penny

I used the Single Shot Express to decimate essay #1 at my first-choice school. Paired with the school... Read more






Not sure where to begin with EssaySnark?
Our Snark Selector
will tell you!



What were we snarking about at this time in past years?

  • 2020: What did the Fed do with interest rates today, and why?
  • 2020: ($) "Will applying in Round 3 weaken my application next season?"
  • 2017: Success Story! Research and the right school targets bring results!
  • 2016: What ethics is not
  • 2016: ($) Why telling the truth in your apps is important.
  • 2015: Quiz Leaderboard
  • 2015: ($) Do bschools have quotas in admissions?
  • 2014: Extracurriculars and military applicants
  • 2012: "School X, or School Y with $$$?" (Part 1.5)
  • 2011: More reasons why a Round 3 application is not a good idea
My Tweets

See the Top U.S. Business Schools on a Map!


EssaySnark is currently available! We're accepting new clients! Standard turnarounds apply. If you're in a hurry, Speedy Review is available!

EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2021 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy

Where should you start with EssaySnark?

Which EssaySnark service is right for you? Answer a few questions to find out!

This field must be set to Everyone - then in the Settings -> HTML -> After Fields screen there's JavaScript to hide it.
Sending