EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Reapplicant Guide
    • Pitching Entrepreneurship as Your Post-MBA Career
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Harvard 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Stanford 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Wharton 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Columbia 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • Testimonials & Reviews
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts

($) Examining those non-answers answers from the presidential debate!

September 16, 2019 by EssaySnark Leave a Comment

We got such an overwhelming response to our invitation to critique the answers from the politicians! (not)

That’s OK. We don’t really have a heavily interactive community, and we don’t mind. It’s fine for all of you to come here for your daily dose of ‘Snark and move on. We know you’re busy.

Besides, critiquing people’s answers to essay questions – how much fun could THAT be?!?

LOL – exactly.

But we still want to lay out some analysis of those answers for you, since building the skills around critiquing this content on other people’s mishaps will get you better at critiquing your own. It’s really worth the effort! Just like with all the exercises we lay out in our SnarkStrategies Guides for applying to bschool. Some of those guides have like a gazillion brainstorming exercises, and we know that many BSers just flip the pages and move right on past, without actually doing them. And that’s kind of defeating the purpose.

If you’ve been doing that, we offer the kind suggestion that maybe you slow down and actually try them.

We get it! The exercises are hard! They’re like HOMEWORK or something!

Same deal with these politicians’ answers to the “professional obstacle” question that we pointed you to on Friday.

But really, spending time on these tasks, working that pretty little brain of yours, that’s where your critical thinking skills can grow. When you can see the flaws in an argument (or how smarmy and posturing some of them were, or how saccharine) then it gives you a hint on how a complete stranger might possibly respond when reading your own drafts of answers. It develops that little sense of what might be good, and authentic — compared to what ends up in a whole different ballpark.

One of the most fundamental aspects to analyzing an answer to a question is, “Does it actually answer the question?”

You can see this as an issue even from how the Post introduced this topic in their article capturing these questions at the end of the debate — here’s what they wrote:

In the final question of Thursday’s debate, the candidates were asked to describe a professional setback, how they recovered and what they learned. Some took liberties with the question, instead choosing to recount a more personal hardship.

Ha!

One of the most common complaints we hear from admissions directors about what MBA applicants do in their essays and also their interviews is they don’t answer the question. You can see how annoying that is by the journalist’s comment there about taking liberties.

When the question asks for X, and you answer with ABC, it’s noticed. When a politician does this, it’s usually spin, or avoidance, or some other dodge. In this case, Biden and Warren (the first two candidates in the video) trotted out their well-worn stump speech stories about hardship. In Warren’s case, the sequence of events essentially is professional in nature, but for Biden, a big nope. Nothing truly “professional” in the content that he discusses in his answer. They both were variations of, “I had a career and this personal thing happened that was hard.” For Biden, it was the car crash that killed his first wife and injured his sons when he was a newly-elected politician. For Warren, it was being a “visibly pregnant” schoolteacher at a time when teachers did not keep working when they were pregnant. We would posit that both of those are more (in EssaySnark’s vernacular) “outside-in” stories which often actually do serve as foundations for good “overcoming an obstacle” questions. However, they didn’t really answer the question — though to their credit, it’s hard to do this on the fly. That’s why when you’re going for your interview, you need to PRACTICE. You can bet your sweet patooty that these candidates all went through hours and hours of practice before getting up on that stage. They all were reasonably fluid in adapting to this question and coming up with answers. Did they actually answer the question as asked? Not really.

So that’s your main takeaway from today, and we invite you to go back over those videos and listen for where each candidate literally answers the question. Write down their answers. Then check it against the question that they were asked. Does it line up?

Here’s the video again if you want to spend some 10 minutes on this now.

Comments are always open if you have anything to share about what you discover or learn!

Filed Under: writing essays

« Previous: We were gonna talk about getting into Columbia today but
Next: ($) A map to writing Columbia essay 3: “a leader you admire” »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 2
    in 4 weeks
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 3
    in 3 months, 0 weeks
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 4
    in 4 months, 2 weeks
   
   

CLASS OF 2025 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

From a former BSer:
"love the guide books!"




    The 2022 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2025
   
    The 2022 Harvard MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
  The 2022 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with clear guidance for the 2022 essays!
   
  The 2022-2023 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2022-2023 applications
   
    The 2022 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video, plus the new optional short-answer question on "the world you come from" -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2025!
   
    The 2022 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values'
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - revised for 2022!
   
    The 2022 UVA Darden MBA Application Guide gives insights on the essays, Early Action, the possibility of a test waiver, and everything else going on here!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Darden MBA - updated for the Class of 2025 requirements!
   
   
The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2025 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2022
   
    The 2022 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2022-2023 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the essays, the EQ Endorsement and test strategies!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2025 essays!
       
   
   
Get started now - without doing any work! The Comprehensive Profile Review will help you start your strategy for your MBA applications.


EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2023 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy