EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Interviewing Guide
    • Getting Off the Waitlist
    • Applying in Round 3 mini-guide
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Columbia 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Harvard 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • MIT Sloan 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • BIPOC Program
    • Testimonials & Reviews
    • Guest Posts
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts
    • Discounts & Offers

Really, Columbia?

April 19, 2016 by EssaySnark - Discusses Columbia 2 Comments

This post has been marked as OLD. EssaySnark's advice and strategies for winning MBA applications don't change from year to year, but some of the school-specific admissions policies, essay questions, or other information covered in this article may be outdated.

As you can see from that little banner announcement that we posted at the top of the site yesterday, Columbia has released its MBA essay questions and application deadlines for the upcoming admissions season. Columbia is typically first out of the gate (sometimes HBS beats them) with making such announcements; they’re the ones to formally kick things off, most years. They’re right on time with what was expected.

We offered our standard shorthand reaction to the new essay questions on our dedicated Columbia school info page (and the Columbia 2016 MBA essay guide will be available shortly) and we were tempted to leave it at that. After all, we’ve done enough Columbia-bashing over the years.

But of course we couldn’t leave it alone.

Not with this one thing that needs to be said.

They’ve left their essays mostly unchanged, which is not uncommon for Columbia Business School. They’re very consistent in what they’re looking for in applicants and the questions they use to solicit that information. They did some tweaking of those questions, which signals the type of essays they DON’T want to get for those questions based on what they got last year (though frankly, anyone who read last year’s Columbia guide would not have made those mistakes, since we anticipated them for you and steered you away from the common issues). None of this was a surprise.

The big change they made was unfortunately a very very (very very very) small one:

They increased the allowed length of your answer to “What’s your immediate post-MBA professional goal?” from 50 characters to (drum roll please)…

51.

When we first saw the number “51” on the Columbia site yesterday, we actually thought we’d made a mistake in the just-passed admissions season. We figured that they had somewhere along the way increased the 50 character limit to 51 last year, for the Class of 2018 application, and we just hadn’t noticed it.

Maybe there was some type of system glitch that did not allow their online application to store 50 characters and they had a system requirement that 51 was the shortest field possible. (Unlikely.) Maybe the IT person who had originally configured the Class of 2018 app software had mistakenly created the field as 51 characters long, and they’d already been accepting apps, so instead of changing it to 50 and cheating new applicants of that extra character, they made it 51 officially. (Also not very likely, but we believe something like this is what happened with Michigan Ross this past year with how they changed their essay prompt in mid-season.) Sometimes schools make mistakes with what they post, and then they fix it.

But we kept looking at our notes and talking with the team here in Snarkville and nobody could remember seeing a 51-character limit before. So after much debate, we had to come to terms with the fact that they upped the limit without upping the limit.

On behalf of all BSers everywhere, we are trying not to be insulted by this.

The thing is, we called Columbia to task last year for decreasing the limit allowed for this answer from 75 characters (Class of 2017) to 50 characters. This was an answer that they used to give you 200 characters for. They kept whacking away at it until we ended up at 50. Which, as we’ve now said like a gazillion times, is ridiculous.

But it’s even more ridiculous to increase it by one character.

What message is THAT supposed to send?

“Here you go, all you future applicants. You said the field was too short. We’ve increased it!”

Ummm….

We try to be the voice of the applicant in this process. It’s an uneven market, with a lack of transparency on the side with the most power. The schools can do whatever they want, generally speaking. That’s definitely true in an era of increasing app volumes. They don’t have to make things easier on their applicants – though thankfully, over the past few years, many of them have tried, by implementing different processes, like the mid-cycle release where candidates who are being rejected find out much earlier than they used to (though that can result in some significant bouts of depression for many) or by reducing the number of essay questions (whether that’s applicant-friendly or not is debatable given the unintended consequence of app inflation – more apps across the board at all schools – which leads to lots more waitlisted applicants). The fact that Columbia has also implemented variable length limits on their three standard essays this year is a nice attempt by the adcom to give applicants more control over the process. (You’ll want to pick up our Columbia 2016 app guide as soon as it’s released since that’s where we’re going to do the full discussion of strategy on essay length for this school.)

We know that some adcoms have started to do customer surveys at the end of the admissions cycle, where they send out a questionnaire to candidates to see what they thought of the process. The first time we saw that – from, we think, Tuck (? could’ve been Yale) – we were pretty impressed. There’s this debate in academia about whether students should be viewed as customers at all – we’re not going to go into that right now but it was certainly refreshing to see some schools solicit feedback on their processes from the people who actually have to suffer through them.

We’ve never heard of Columbia doing formal surveys but maybe they do. Certainly admitted students will give unsolicited feedback to admissions on elements of an application that they don’t like (and rejected students also do too, frequently with high emotions and less objectivity). The schools do get an impression of what people think of their requirements. But it’s not like schools are focused on pleasing the customer. This is not a repeat-buyer business; it’s one time through the process and then most people move on, or if they end up as a reapplicant, if they’re smart they’re not going to b!tch to the school about how awful the app was the first time they went through it. Adcoms aren’t in the business of people-pleasing. They’re not trying to court repeat customers coming back again and again. It’s easy for schools to get blinders on and be willfully oblivious to the pain and suffering they impose on their candidates.

(OK, that’s a little extreme. Limiting a short-answer question to only 50 err 51 characters is not in the category of “pain and suffering” – but it does make it difficult on the applicant – in our opinion, unnecessarily so.)

We’re not so arrogant as to assume that all schools actually read the little snarky blahg we’ve got going here – though we know that sometimes they do! We’re trying not to take this personally. It’s not like we think that there was some discussion in the Columbia Admissions Team Conference Room in Uris Hall when they were deciding on the app requirements this year, and someone said, “Hey, last time EssaySnark was pretty upset about how we took that field down to 50 characters and they thought it should be bigger” and someone else said, “OK, let’s increase it to 51 then!” and everyone laughed and so they did it.

BUT.

We honestly cannot imagine what conversation DID transpire for them to go from 50 to 51.

What message is that intended to send?

Why not just keep the darned thing exactly the same?

It’s not like most UP-AND-COMING APPLICANTS who are applying for their very first time in the about-to-begin application season would ever notice the difference. Maybe they’ll be like, “51 characters? That’s a weird number” and move on. Most of them have no clue as to the history.

Keeping track of those things is our job.

Any change will obviously be subject to scrutinization (yes that’s a word) in Snarkville. They could not have expected this to go un-snarked-upon. So again, we’re trying not to over-interpret (or take it personally) but we have to issue this, usually reserved for only the very special essays we’re reviewing, as our final assessment:

WTF?!

EssaySnark feels like little minions running around launching marshmallows at the walls of the Ivory Tower where these adcom people reside. We’ll keep our marshmallow-launchers fully stocked and ready to fire, on behalf of you BSers, even though all they seem to do is bounce off.

Filed Under: school reviews & insights, the admissions consulting industry Bschools: Columbia

« Previous: A plea to Admissions Directors: Move Round 2 deadlines to later in January.
Next: The other likely driver of increased MBA app volumes »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Here's what others have said about this:

  1. Char says

    April 19, 2016 at 8:41 am

    Some of us love reading your ‘little snarky blahg’ 🙂

    I agree, the 1 character increase sounds ridiculous. Maybe they wanted to account for the dot at the end of the sentence? Who knows. In any case, I am happy I am not applying to Columbia. All the time they gave that impression of aloofness on me, and they demonstrate it again with this…

    Reply
    • essaysnark says

      April 20, 2016 at 8:25 am

      Aw, thanks, Char!

      You know, we’ve heard feedback about Columbia such as you’ve shared before. We do know that they made a concerted effort to try and change the culture to a more team-focused and outwardly friendly(ier) one but still, we hear people say these things. “Aloof” is a good way to put it. Admittedly, culture is hard to change (but then yeah, they do weird stuff like this, which makes ya wonder…).

      Anyway, thanks for the kind words, and we hope to see you around again!

      EssaySnark

      Reply

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '22 Intake Rd 2
    in 1 month, 2 weeks, 3 days, 17 hours
  • (expected) HBS Class of 2024 app requirements released
    in 2 months, 0 weeks, 0 days, 18 hours
  • (expected) Columbia J-Term/ED app to open
    in 2 months, 4 weeks, 1 day, 18 hours
  • INSEAD Jan '22 Intake Rd 3
    in 3 months, 1 week, 5 days, 17 hours
   
From a BSer January 2020:
"love the guide books!"


CLASS OF 2023 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

     
    The 2020 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2023 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2020-2021 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the main essay, the EQ Endorsement and Pick Six!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2023 essays!
   
    The 2020-2021 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2020-2021 applications
   
    The 2020 Harvard MBA Application Guide - completely overhauled and updated for the coronavirus era!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
    The 2020-2021 Duke Essay Guide - covers the 25 Random Things essay and all the rest too!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Duke Fuqua - up to date for the current season!
   
    The 2020-2021 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the contacts for two references, and additional tips for the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2023!
   
    The 2020-2021 Tuck Essay Guide has been refreshed with latest insights and advice for your essays about "investing generously" and "why Tuck"!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Dartmouth Tuck MBA - completely overhauled for 2020, to help you demonstrate how you are nice, aware, etc stuff!
   
    The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2023 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2020-2021
   
    The 2020-2021 Chicago Booth MBA Application Guide - ready to go to support your Class of 2023 essay strategy!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Chicago Booth for this year's MBA app!
   
    The 2020 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with new tips for 2020!
   
    The 2020 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values' -- plus tips on 2020 world events and applicability to your essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - updated and revised for the new realities of 2020!    
      The 2020 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2023
   
    The 2020-2021 UCLA Anderson MBA Application Guide - updated for Class of 2023 on "impact"!
SnarkStrategies Guide for 
UCLA
   
   

Brave Supplicants' latest reviews on The 'Snark


Feb 11, 2021
by hopeful on MBA Interview Prep: Custom Practice Questions
Helpful

Just wanted to say thank you for these questions! A lot of them were really tailored to my profile, ... Read more

Apr 10, 2020
by George on EssaySnark
Great Starting Point

I thought getting over the GRE/GMAT hurdle was fairly straightforward--disciplined study then test execution... Read more

Apr 10, 2020
by George on Single Shot Express MBA Essay Review
Worth Every Penny

I used the Single Shot Express to decimate essay #1 at my first-choice school. Paired with the school... Read more






Not sure where to begin with EssaySnark?
Our Snark Selector
will tell you!



What were we snarking about at this time in past years?

  • 2020: The Fed and the virus
  • 2020: What you control in life
  • 2019: ($) "What can I do to improve my chances?" GMAT edition
  • 2018: Quote of the Day
  • 2018: The main argument in favor of a larger school
  • 2017: New "Add to Favorites" blahg feature
  • 2017: Plea for Help! "Maybe I'm not as qualified as I thought..."
  • 2015: *NOW* what are your reasons for going for an MBA?
  • 2015: ($) Everybody's at a disadvantage in admissions
  • 2014: Someone is starting early!
My Tweets

See the Top U.S. Business Schools on a Map!


EssaySnark is currently available! We're accepting new clients! Standard turnarounds apply. If you're in a hurry, Speedy Review is available!

EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2021 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy

Where should you start with EssaySnark?

Which EssaySnark service is right for you? Answer a few questions to find out!

This field must be set to Everyone - then in the Settings -> HTML -> After Fields screen there's JavaScript to hide it.
Sending