EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • Waitlisted Guide
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Columbia 2019 MBA Essay Guide
      • Wharton 2019 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Harvard 2019 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Stanford 2019 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2019 MBA Strategy Guide
      • MIT Sloan 2019 MBA Essay Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2019 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Duke Fuqua 2019 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
    • Reapplicant Guide
    • MBA Career Goals: ENTREPRENEURSHIP
    • Applying to European MBA Programs
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • Testimonials & Reviews
    • Guest Posts
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts
    • Discounts & Offers

More EMBA admissions and GMAT observations

February 11, 2016 by EssaySnark - Discusses Chicago Booth, Kellogg, Wharton 5 Comments

If you missed the GMAT data presented yesterday, you may want to go back and check that out first.

Continuing on…

In a EMBA admissions posting recently, the Wharton team mentioned strategies about when to apply in Round 1 versus Round 2, saying that sometimes it’s better to delay in order to have time to retake the GMAT.

We’ll say that again:

They gave advice that some applicants would benefit from applying later in order to retake the GMAT.

OK, in case you’re not picking up what we’re laying down:

As a general rule, EMBA programs are simply not as competitive as the full-time MBA. There aren’t as many applicants, and the adcoms are less choosey. Not completely un-choosey, but less so.

They still need to see some quality elements to a profile – decent grades from college, a passable GMAT score. But the averages for both are not in the same realm as their F/T counterparts. In most cases, the EMBA adcoms are focusing instead on your professional experience. It’s MUCH more important at most of these places that you’re a fit to their program based on career. They want to see that you’re at an appropriate place in your professional development to benefit from what they offer, and to contribute to the class.

Wharton is saying here that sometimes a higher GMAT score is worth delaying your app till later in their cycle – which is the kind of advice you more often hear from the adcoms for the competitive F/T programs. The GMAT score matters at any school but it matters a lot less at an EMBA, simply because they don’t get nearly as many applications and so there aren’t as many top-scoring candidates fighting for prominence. Here, Wharton is signalling that yes, the GMAT matters in their evaluation and selection process, and a higher score can help, and that it may be worth the effort to take the test again. At other schools, the GMAT is not exactly just a check-the-box thing, in terms of making sure you have one and it doesn’t matter what it is. But it’s not like this.

Now, we’re not trying to claim that you can waltz into the Columbia or the Haas EMBA programs with a 500 GMAT. That score is low if we’re talking any program at any top school. But, when a BSer talks to the admissions folks at any EMBA program they very rarely emphasize the GMAT issue quite so much.

In fact, Kellogg’s EMBA does not even require a GMAT for most applicants. Yeah. That.

Chicago Booth will waive the GMAT requirement for some of their most senior applicants who can demonstrate sufficient quant proficiency through their job. That being said, the waiver sounds atypical. You apparently have to actually qualify for it. As proof, here’s what Chicago Booth EMBA folks tell their candidates:

Candidate: “I don’t have time to study for and take the GMAT.”

Booth: “Then you don’t have time to be a Chicago Booth student.”

Judging an EMBA program on its GMAT policies is painting with a broad brush, but it’s a helpful way to crack open some of these issues of selectivity and competitiveness – and it helps you to appreciate what types of students you’ll be in the classroom with. Did they even have to take the GMAT? Or if they did, did they have to bust butt and get a good score? Or did they just have to take it so that they could say that they took it? How much do they really want to be there?

You may curse the barriers to entry that the top bschools present with things like GMAT scores especially, but generally speaking, they do serve as a useful filtering mechanism.

When someone works really hard to get accepted to a program, then we’re betting they’re going to be more engaged and involved all the way through.

Filed Under: Executive MBA/EMBA Bschools: Chicago Booth, Kellogg, Wharton

« Previous: Just like with bschools, EMBA programs are not all created equally.
Next: If you’re interested in an MBA you need to see this. »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Here's what others have said about this:

  1. levieillard says

    February 14, 2016 at 3:22 pm

    This reminded me of the INSEAD study that found the closer a student’s GMAT score was to 800, the higher her GPA, but the close it was to 600, the higher their post-MBA salary. There is probably some non-intuitive reason, such as INSEAD’s high percentage of McKinsey or Rolland Berger consultants coming back for an MBA. Someone like that might decide the exact minimum score she needs to get in, and the studied exactly as little as possible, because her work life is so busy.

    Additionally, In my EMBA cohort, the distribution of smarts, technical skills, and experience is very wide. The bell curve is more of a pancake. I suspect that MBA classes are much more uniformly populated.

    And I’ve noticed that going into an EMBA with a distinctive GMAT has a couple of implications:

    * People on my team rely on me to understand and explain the technical concepts from accounting, finance, and decision modeling. I thought I would be a little frustrated, like the eagle surrounded but turkeys, but actually it’s useful and enjoyable. (a) You don’t really understand something until you can teach it to someone else. (b) My post-MBA career is going to involve lots of my explaining things to other people who are literally paying me to be smart for them.

    * It’s relatively easy to earn the competitively awarded A’s. Yes, GPA doesn’t matter much, and most of the top schools have a non-disclosure policy anyways. This is especially true for EMBAs, with an exception for distinctive academic awards or honors, which go onto your resume.

    Reply
    • levieillard says

      February 14, 2016 at 3:23 pm

      Here is an article that mentions the INSEAD study:
      [link to GMAT test prep company’s blog post deleted due to lack of attribution]

      Reply
      • essaysnark says

        February 16, 2016 at 8:10 pm

        While totally interesting, unfortunately their blog post does not cite the actual INSEAD study and we could not locate it ourselves. In something so core to an argument on GMAT scores then you’d think they’d cite the source. We’re ditching the link for now but will restore it if the actual INSEAD study is identified.

        Reply
    • essaysnark says

      February 16, 2016 at 8:18 pm

      @levieillard, the anecdotes from your EMBA experience continue to be interesting! EssaySnark certainly appreciated the team members who explained stuff to us when going through bschool – your contributions are likely more valued by your peers than you know. 🙂

      On the INSEAD data, we’re still digging around on the interwebs to try and find that study, since it certainly seems worth looking at! Your hypothesis about the consultants at INSEAD might be on track, though in our experience, those who are coming to bschool from McKinsey tend to have stratospheric GMAT scores, regardless of whether they’re being sponsored for the MBA or not. It just goes with the McKinsey personality.

      EssaySnark

      Reply
      • levieillard says

        February 17, 2016 at 6:05 pm

        Good points. I would love to see the original study, too.

        I can imagine good reasons that results like that not openly published. (1) It’s proprietary admissions data. (2) It’s part of an admissions strategy, and (3) therefore part of INSEAD’s strategy and competitive advantage.

        Reply

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

     

2019 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

    The 2019 Columbia MBA Application Guide - if you're applying to Columbia this season, GET YOUR APP IN NOW!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2019 applications
   
    The 2019 Harvard MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School - ready to help you with your interview prep!
   
    The 2019 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2022
   
    The 2019 MIT Essay Guide with brand-new material on the org chart, the contacts for two references, and additional tips for the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for 2019!
   
    The 2019 Chicago Booth MBA Application Guide - ready to go to support your Class of 2022 essay strategy!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Chicago Booth for 2019!
   
    The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for 2019!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for Class of 2022    
    The 2019 Duke Essay Guide - covers the 25 Random Things essay and all the rest too!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Duke Fuqua - up to date for 2019!
   
    The 2019 Cornell Johnson MBA Application Guide - with help on career goals, and impact, and back-of-the-resume assignments, plus a new section on the Cornell Tech MBA Personal Statement!
SnarkStrategies MBA Guide for Cornell - covers the 2019 essays!
   
    The 2019 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the main essay, the EQ Endorsement and Pick Six!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the 2019 essays!
   
    The 2019 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with new tips for 2019!
   
    The 2019 Tuck Essay Guide has been refreshed with latest insights and advice for your "nice" and "aware" etc essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Dartmouth Tuck MBA - completely overhauled for 2019 and the nice, aware, etc stuff!
   
    The 2019 UVA Darden MBA Application Guide gives insights on the purposeful leader with impact, and the diversity essay, plus the Batten scholarship essays, and Early Action, and everything else going on here! s
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Darden MBA - completely overhauled for the Class of 2022 requirements!
   
    The 2019 Michigan Ross Application Guide - covers the short-answer questions and your short-term goal essay too!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Ross - revised for 2019!
   
    The 2019 UCLA Anderson MBA Application Guide - updated for Class of 2022 essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for 
UCLA - overhauled to help you with the personal essay!
   


Brave Supplicants' latest reviews on The 'Snark


Dec 5, 2019
by henrique on Single Shot Express MBA Essay Review
Awesome, buy it

Thank you Essay Snark for this excellent service. You keep surprising me with the quality of the feedback... Read more

Oct 10, 2019
by Damilola on Reworking Your Resume App Accelerator
Detailed and helpful advice

Thought my resume was all set until I ran it through the app accelerator. Detailed feedback ... Read more

Sep 21, 2019
by CNX on
Thank you!

Hi EssaySnark, I just wanted to send you a quick thank-you e-mail, from a French BSer, applying... Read more






Not sure where to begin with EssaySnark?
Our Snark Selector
will tell you!



What were we snarking about at this time in past years?

  • 2017: Some perspective on receiving feedback.
  • 2016: Success Story! "I only needed one R1 application to convert."
  • 2016: ($) Inside out, vs outside in stories for your MBA essays (Berkeley, Kellogg, Stanford)
  • 2015: Good Luck to Round 1ers!
  • 2015: ($) Why the adcom won't believe your career goals.
  • 2015: "If it feels forced, I'm doing it wrong."
  • 2014: ($) One more post on too-specific MBA career goals
  • 2013: ($) essay critique! Tepper short-term goal
  • 2012: ($) Low GPA and the optional essay
  • 2011: Guest post! A Success Story and bit o' advice
My Tweets

See the Top U.S. Business Schools on a Map!


EssaySnark is currently available! We're accepting new clients! Standard turnarounds apply. If you're in a hurry, Speedy Review is available!

EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010-2019 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy

Where should you start with EssaySnark?

Which EssaySnark service is right for you? Answer a few questions to find out!

This field must be set to Everyone - then in the Settings -> HTML -> After Fields screen there's JavaScript to hide it.
Sending