EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Reapplicant Guide
    • Pitching Entrepreneurship as Your Post-MBA Career
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Harvard 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Stanford 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Wharton 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Columbia 2022 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • Testimonials & Reviews
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts

Kellogg is into “growth” now – not “thinking”

September 18, 2014 by EssaySnark - Discusses Kellogg 2 Comments

We were thrilled when we saw Kellogg’s essay questions this year, where they had dropped their “Think Bravely” concept from the prompts and weren’t forcing applicants to shoehorn their stories into some uncomfortable mold in an attempt to match the school’s branding. Last year we had seen many very good stories get perverted in the essay-drafting process. BSers had to jump through hoops to make sure that what they were writing about was appropriately reflecting the Kellogg tagline, per the way that the school had asked their questions.

But the Kellogg tagline was always slippery at best – when it was originally announced, there was all kinds of marketing hoopla about it and they published this video with Dean Blount explaining it . She talked about it in terms of collaboration and markets and innovation and broader wisdom (or is it the “public-private interface”?).

Here’s a Pro Tip for organizations of any type: If your CEO needs to spend almost 2 minutes interpreting your tagline to your audience, then maybe the tagline isn’t that good.

Shoot – even the tagline had a tagline:
Think Bravely

The other problem with “Think Bravely” was that it was completely undifferentiated from all the other schools exhorting everyone to “think”. Kellogg and Think Bravely were just part of a trend of bschool branding babble.

Now Kellogg has ditched “Think Bravely” completely – today they’re “Growth Minded” . And here’s the kicker: Dean Blount has claimed that “Think Bravely”, even with all its hoopla and slick marketing materials and fancy new website at the time, that that was just meant as a placeholder until the “real” brand was defined.

Huh.

If this was a public corporation, we can only imagine the types of questions that the CEO would be fielding on their next quarterly earnings call if they tried this move. Talk about revisionist history.

It’s kinda like when a Brave Supplicant (no relationship to “Think Bravely”) tries to explain away their poor grades in college by saying that they were actively pursuing opportunities to try new things and test their boundaries, and in the process of all that risk-taking that they were doing, there were some casualties (namely, their GPA). But that their low GPA doesn’t accurately reflect their abilities. Nice try at whitewashing but please, do you really expect us to buy this?

Anyone perusing this blahg for any length of time (and gawd we hope we don’t catch anyone use the word “perusing” in their essays) will know that we can never resist an opportunity to call out a school. We wouldn’t much care about this change of heart in Kellogg’s brand identity – especially since it doesn’t affect this year’s applicants.

OR DOES IT?

Here’s the deal: When a school starts broadcasting who it is so loudly, then that’s a pretty strong signal that this who-they-are thing is something they care about in their students – which means, perchance, that this might be something that they are GOING TO BE LOOKING FOR IN THEIR APPLICANTS.

Kellogg has already quite directly used its branding in the screening process, by integrating their tagline in their essay prompts in past years.

Any astute observer of the Kellogg landscape is going to only wonder how much they will be screening this year’s crop of Brave Supplicants for this “growth” mindset.

None of their questions are literally asking about “growth.”

It’s not like anyone would KNOW that they should be talking about “growth” in their essays. Not, at least, from how the essay questions are phrased.

And hopefully (HOPEFULLY!) nobody will be given preferential treatment just because they end up using a story focusing on “growth” in one of their two Kellogg essays.

We are certainly not suggesting that any Kellogg applicant should switch out their strategy and try to finnagle a set of essays that are talking about “growth” – definitely do not do this if you’re already set on your stories and feeling confident in what you’re presenting about yourself. Which hopefully you are, given this late date.

It’s the “this late date” part that we’re so miffed about. Kellogg created a massive amount of unnecessary stress for its applicants last year by changing the rules multiple times right at the time when their first-round apps were due – they significantly changed their process last year (they used to have a quite confusing two-step app that was non-standard with a whole decision-tree mess of a set of submission dates and if-this/then-that rules that you had to figure out) but they clearly had not mapped things out for themselves very well and they tossed up some real wringers at Brave Supplicants. Plus, they introduced the video essays and their tech was not fully tested or something so many people struggled with that too.

We had thought that they’d learned the lesson.

But no. Here again we get them launching some major school-specific change right when Round 1 is upon us.

Do you really think that this won’t stress people out, in wondering if their Kellogg strategy is still sound?

For a school that proclaims itself to be so “intensely focused” on the customer… you have to wonder.

Dean Blount has been there for four years now. We sure hope that there are bigger changes coming out of Evanston in the very near future than just another rebranding campaign. From our limited view on things from here in Snarkville, we’re not seeing interest in Kellogg on the rise.

LOL – we apparently had linked to a video on meditation originally, instead of to Kellogg’s little ad thing – whoops. Fixed 2:30pm Eastern. (Coulda been worse, huh? 😉 )

Please tell us: What does that empty chair in a moved-out office in the opening shot have to do with anything? That image looks like failure, not growth.

 
 

Update 2016: Here’s an EssaySnark post about Duke and the CEO of Caterpillar talking about growth (be sure to check the comments), and we can also direct you to what a Kellogg student had to say about “growth”, too .

Filed Under: school reviews & insights Tagged With: rant Bschools: Kellogg

« Previous: Words that appear only in essays and resumes
Next: ($) “Show, don’t tell.” »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Here's what others have said about this:

  1. levieillard says

    September 18, 2014 at 4:01 pm

    This change makes me sad. Growth is not a business strategy. It’s one byproduct of success. Sure, you can wave your hands, talk about personal or professional development, and pretend that’s what you mean, but a CEO will hear growth and think of revenue, market share, and share price.

    Furthermore, a growth focus can be ruinous for professionals like auditors, consultants, lawyers, doctors, etc.. It’s not how you compete:

    http://www.clearlytech.com/2014/01/12/rapid-engineering-growth-business-strategy/

    Professional values demand putting the client first, and values have a cost; a firm must be willing to turn down profitable opportunities that are not in the best interest of their clients. Otherwise, they cannot claim to hold those values. A growth focus won’t encourage values-based sacrifices.

    Sigh. Sorry. Clearly I have a chip on my shoulder.

    Reply
    • essaysnark says

      September 21, 2014 at 3:08 am

      Thanks for that link; agree with it completely.

      And as a near-perfect follow-up (or not): Here is one of the most ridiculous spin-pieces we’ve seen in awhile: For companies to grow, why bigger is not always better by Dean Blount. The title does not even match the points raised in the article, and there are so many assertions here that just seem ludicrous. Airbnb created a new market? No, they created a new source of supply – the market is the same (people looking for a place to stay). And she says “they did it by studying the emergence of the ‘sharing economy.'” Uh, no; Airbnb was the emergence of the sharing economy. They practically created it. Along with Zipcar and now Uber and everybody. But Airbnb was one of the originals. You’d think she’d have had it fact-checked or vetted by someone before publishing.

      “Sigh” is right.

      Reply

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 2
    in 2 weeks
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 3
    in 2 months, 3 weeks
  • INSEAD Jan '24 Intake Rd 4
    in 4 months, 0 weeks
   
   

CLASS OF 2025 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

From a former BSer:
"love the guide books!"




    The 2022 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2025
   
    The 2022 Harvard MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
  The 2022 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with clear guidance for the 2022 essays!
   
  The 2022-2023 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2022-2023 applications
   
    The 2022 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video, plus the new optional short-answer question on "the world you come from" -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2025!
   
    The 2022 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values'
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - revised for 2022!
   
    The 2022 UVA Darden MBA Application Guide gives insights on the essays, Early Action, the possibility of a test waiver, and everything else going on here!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Darden MBA - updated for the Class of 2025 requirements!
   
   
The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2025 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2022
   
    The 2022 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2025 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2022-2023 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the essays, the EQ Endorsement and test strategies!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2025 essays!
       
   
   
Get started now - without doing any work! The Comprehensive Profile Review will help you start your strategy for your MBA applications.


EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2023 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy