EssaySnark

  • about
  • contact
  • help
  • sign up
  • login
CLICK FOR MORE!
  • Essay Questions
    • Harvard
    • Stanford
    • Wharton
    • Chicago Booth
    • Kellogg
    • MIT Sloan
    • Tuck
    • NYU Stern
    • Columbia
    • Yale SOM
    • Berkeley Haas
    • UVA Darden
    • Duke Fuqua
    • Michigan Ross
    • UCLA Anderson
    • Cornell
  • Strategy Guides
    • MBA Interviewing Guide
    • Getting Off the Waitlist
    • Applying in Round 3 mini-guide
    • Applying to European Business Schools
    • School-Specific MBA Application Guides
      • Columbia 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Harvard 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Kellogg 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • MIT Sloan 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • Chicago Booth 2020 MBA Strategy Guide
      • *MORE SCHOOL-SPECIFIC GUIDES HERE*
  • MBA Consulting
    • Free essay reviews
    • What stage are you in?
    • Military MBA
    • BIPOC Program
    • Testimonials & Reviews
    • Guest Posts
  • My SnarkCenter
    • My Strategy Guides
    • My Favorite Posts
    • Discounts & Offers

Some schools are screwing up.

July 16, 2013 by EssaySnark - Discusses Harvard, MIT Sloan 4 Comments

We get it. The bschools don’t like candidates to use consultants. We totally understand why.

Some consultants tell their clients what to say in their essays – even if they don’t literally write the darn things themselves, they dictate the strategy, with the completely Machiavellian attitude that the ends justify the means – it’s OK to say whatever you need to say, as long as you get in.

No, it’s not.

Other consultants are blatantly unethical – we’ve heard multiple reports this year about consultants telling applicants to apply to Columbia ED even though it’s not the person’s first choice school, but they tell them to use it as an “insurance policy” because it’s easier to get in. But the person knows they would walk from Columbia if they were accepted elsewhere. The consultant rationalizes it, claiming that Columbia makes money on the deal by collecting the nonrefundable deposits, so it’s a victimless crime.

No, it’s not.

Attitudes and behaviors like this suck. We don’t like that type of “admissions consulting” (the quotation marks are there for a reason). In the past we’ve called those people “the adcon“. You listen to that “advice” and you self-justify the behaviors and you are changed, not for the better. You start making small compromises of your ethics – not that either of these are what we consider “small” – and sure enough, you get sucked into a black hole of ethical ambiguity, and you end up selling junk bonds or CDOs or reverse mortgages to seniors or whatever the next financial instrument that takes advantage of others becomes.

This post was not intended to be the rant that it’s become. OK, back on track.

The reason we’re writing this post is actually to call out some what we feel to be very shortsighted and irrational behavior on the part of certain admissions committees this year. There are two essay questions in particular that are gawdawful difficult this season. One question is near-inscrutible in its meaning; you read it and read it and you just can’t figure out what they’re asking you to write about. The other is just so damn broad that it isn’t a question.

In case you’re not following, we’re talking about MIT Essay 1 and Harvard.

We know that the schools don’t like applicants using consultants. We know that consultants taint the waters. We know that applicants often aren’t presenting their authentic true selves when there’s too many advisors contributing to the mix. We know that consultants influence the final product. We know that this pisses some of the adcom off to no end.

One reason that essay questions change every year is so that those books floating around of “Harvard Essays That Worked!” are deemed useless. Dee Leopold must’ve been miffed when some of her HBS students launched a company selling HBS essays – using money from the school to start the company . So much for screening candidates for honor and integrity (not to mention loyalty).

Darn. Off track again. What is our point?

OUR POINT IS THAT THIS YEAR’S ESSAY QUESTIONS ARE GOING TO SEND APPLICANTS RUNNING INTO THE ARMS OF ADMISSIONS CONSULTANTS.

Check out the comments starting to flow over on the Harvard thread on GMAT Club. People don’t know what to do with this essay. The drafts we’ve seen so far demonstrate that in spades.

And MIT? Like, really? What are you people asking??

Wharton had an awful question last year that was completely obtuse, but it was one of several that you could choose from. If you didn’t want to deal with it, you could have opted for one of the other selections. And it was part of a set of three essays in the app. MIT has just two total for their application. Sloan is going to be getting useless essays from a lot of people this year. Like, HALF of their essays might be bad.

We get it, the essays aren’t supposed to count for much. Then why do the essays AT ALL? Why put people through the wringer like this if the essays really don’t matter?

If the essays do matter, then gosh darn it, please be direct and ASK WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO KNOW.

Like UCLA has done. Refreshing, that. Thank you, Anderson. You don’t need a secret decoder ring to understand what they’re asking.

When an assignment is easy to understand and straightforward to accomplish, it instills confidence in the person being asked to complete it. A confident person is a self-sufficient person. EssaySnark had always assumed that that’s the kind of person you schools are looking for. Instead, we’re betting that HBS and MIT have now contributed to an increase in YoY revenue in the admissions consulting industry.

Filed Under: the admissions consulting industry Tagged With: rant Bschools: Harvard, MIT Sloan

« Previous: ($) The perils of asking for recommendations *too* early
Next: ($) essay critique: Stanford “improved an organization” »

So who the heck is EssaySnark, anyway?!

We're the snarky experts in MBA admissions!

Sometimes amused and often appalled by what candidates write in their MBA applications to top bschools, EssaySnark created this little blahg to share common mistakes. Learn from them and avoid making admissions directors laugh (or want to hurl) when they read your essays. If you are hoping to have your essay reviewed anonymously on the blahg for free, submit it for consideration.

Want EssaySnark's personal assistance with your MBA applications? Start with our menu of consulting services and please read the Help FAQ to learn how we operate. Still have questions after doing all that? Email Team EssaySnark at gethelpnow at essaysnark dot com.

Good luck on your apps, Brave Supplicant!

Here's what others have said about this:

  1. sarah says

    July 16, 2013 at 1:01 pm

    YOY?

    Reply
    • essaysnark says

      July 16, 2013 at 1:03 pm

      Year over Year

      Reply
  2. Pru says

    July 16, 2013 at 1:25 pm

    Or maybe they want to see how comfortable applicants are with that ambiguity?

    Reply
    • essaysnark says

      July 16, 2013 at 1:45 pm

      Well that’s the obvious intent, yes.

      Reply

Tell us what you think. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign up for the 'Snark via email

Enter your address to get weekday blahg posts by email.

UPCOMING MBA APP DEADLINES

  • INSEAD Jan '22 Intake Rd 2
    in 1 month, 2 weeks, 0 days, 18 hours
  • (expected) HBS Class of 2024 app requirements released
    in 1 month, 4 weeks, 0 days, 19 hours
  • (expected) Columbia J-Term/ED app to open
    in 2 months, 3 weeks, 5 days, 19 hours
  • INSEAD Jan '22 Intake Rd 3
    in 3 months, 1 week, 2 days, 18 hours
   
From a BSer January 2020:
"love the guide books!"


CLASS OF 2023 MBA APPLICATION STRATEGY GUIDES

     
    The 2020 Berkeley-Haas MBA Application Guide - updated for the Class of 2023 application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Berkeley Haas - refreshed and updated, with brainstorming exercises and structured maps to help you focus your stories!
   
    The 2020-2021 NYU Stern MBA Application Guide that covers the main essay, the EQ Endorsement and Pick Six!
SnarkStrategies Guide for NYU - discusses your requirements for the Class of 2023 essays!
   
    The 2020-2021 Columbia MBA Application Guide
SnarkStrategies Guide for Columbia Business School for 2020-2021 applications
   
    The 2020 Harvard MBA Application Guide - completely overhauled and updated for the coronavirus era!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Harvard Business School!
   
    The 2020-2021 Duke Essay Guide - covers the 25 Random Things essay and all the rest too!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Duke Fuqua - up to date for the current season!
   
    The 2020-2021 MIT Essay Guide covers the org chart, the contacts for two references, and additional tips for the cover letter and 'introduce yourself' video -- and everything else you need to know!
SnarkStrategies Guide for MIT Sloan MBA - totally revised for the Class of 2023!
   
    The 2020-2021 Tuck Essay Guide has been refreshed with latest insights and advice for your essays about "investing generously" and "why Tuck"!
SnarkStrategies Guide for the Dartmouth Tuck MBA - completely overhauled for 2020, to help you demonstrate how you are nice, aware, etc stuff!
   
    The Yale SOM MBA Application Guide for Class of 2023 candidates!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Yale SOM - updated for 2020-2021
   
    The 2020-2021 Chicago Booth MBA Application Guide - ready to go to support your Class of 2023 essay strategy!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Chicago Booth for this year's MBA app!
   
    The 2020 Wharton MBA Application Guide - even more advice on how to get to a win with those essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for The Wharton School - with new tips for 2020!
   
    The 2020 Kellogg Essay Guide - with a full methodology to identify your 'lasting impact' and your 'values' -- plus tips on 2020 world events and applicability to your essays!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Kellogg MBA - updated and revised for the new realities of 2020!    
      The 2020 Stanford MBA Application Guide - for "what matters most" in your MBA application!
SnarkStrategies Guide for Stanford GSB for the Class of 2023
   
    The 2020-2021 UCLA Anderson MBA Application Guide - updated for Class of 2023 on "impact"!
SnarkStrategies Guide for 
UCLA
   
   

Brave Supplicants' latest reviews on The 'Snark


Feb 11, 2021
by hopeful on MBA Interview Prep: Custom Practice Questions
Helpful

Just wanted to say thank you for these questions! A lot of them were really tailored to my profile, ... Read more

Apr 10, 2020
by George on EssaySnark
Great Starting Point

I thought getting over the GRE/GMAT hurdle was fairly straightforward--disciplined study then test execution... Read more

Apr 10, 2020
by George on Single Shot Express MBA Essay Review
Worth Every Penny

I used the Single Shot Express to decimate essay #1 at my first-choice school. Paired with the school... Read more






Not sure where to begin with EssaySnark?
Our Snark Selector
will tell you!



What were we snarking about at this time in past years?

  • 2020: "What should I do with my summer?"
  • 2019: ($) Got a glitch with your grades? TAKE ACTION NOW!
  • 2018: Should you care who the dean is?
  • 2018: Does it matter who the dean is? 2018 edition
  • 2017: If you really want to go to Harvard...
  • 2016: Another little quiz
  • 2016: ($) When your safety school is actually a stretch school.
  • 2015: ($) Deciding on a school: Does location matter?
  • 2013: Success Story! "It's complicated..."
  • 2012: "School X, or School Y with $$$?" (Part who knows)
My Tweets

See the Top U.S. Business Schools on a Map!


EssaySnark is currently available! We're accepting new clients! Standard turnarounds apply. If you're in a hurry, Speedy Review is available!

EssaySnark® is a registered trademark. All content copyright © 2010–2021 Snarkolicious Press · Privacy Policy

Where should you start with EssaySnark?

Which EssaySnark service is right for you? Answer a few questions to find out!

This field must be set to Everyone - then in the Settings -> HTML -> After Fields screen there's JavaScript to hide it.
Sending